Explain Kant’s claim that, “To be beneficent where one can is a duty….” (p.14) Later in the Metaphysics of Morals Kant writes, “ …as to the meritorious duty toward others, the natural end that all human beings have is their own happiness. Now humanity would be able to subsist if no one contributed to the happiness of others yet did not intentionally remove anything from it; only this is only a negative and not a positive agreement with humanity as end in itself, if everyone does not aspire, as much as he can, to further the ends of others. For regarding the subject which is an end in itself: if that representation is to have its total effect on me, then its ends must as far as possible also be my ends.” (p.48) Does Kant’s argument here remain consistent with the concept of non-consequential justifications?How can this duty be consistently defended non-consequentially?
Do You Need A Similar Assignment Done For You From Scratch? We Have Qualified Writers To Help You. We Assure You An A+ Quality Paper That Is Free From Plagiarism. Order Now For An Amazing Discount!
Very professional support! Highly recommended.
Researched complicated topic and delivered report by the requested deadline. The paper is of a high standard reflecting careful research and clear assessments. I recommend iLecturers.com.com
It’s a 5 start for me. Excellent research and writing. The paper reflects a careful assessment of scientific information.
With Gib’s reflection, they wrote a really specific essay. Very well written, containing all of the languages I required and excellent references. The writer follows my instructions and writes clearly in English.
I am so grateful and I am 100% happy with your work.
A fantastic piece of work 👏. The writer demonstrated full knowledge of the topic and applying the relevant provided material. Well done.