Ethical Questions Please read these assignment instructions

Ethical Questions Please read these assignment instructions before writing yourpaper, and re-read them often during and after the writing process tomake sure that you are fulfilling all of the instructions. Please alsoutilize the assignment guidance, the modeled example, and the outline provided.OverviewThe following assignment is an exercise designed to help youbegin the process of addressing a moral issue, a process that willcontinue in the next two assignments. In this exercise, you will do thefollowing:THE TOPIC THAT I PICK IS Euthanasia and/or physician-assisted suicide for non-standard reasons, such as non-terminal conditions (pain,disability, depression, free choice, etc).Provide an introduction in which you briefly explain the topic and the particular question on which you will focus your paper.State your position on the question at issue.Identify one consideration that would support your position and one consideration that would challenge it. InstructionsThe exercise must be at least 500 words in length (excludingtitle and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style asoutlined in the Ashford Writing Center.Be sure to include a title page and, if you include references, abibliography. The exercise should be in outline (not essay) format, witheach part labeled and numbered as specified below.Part One: Formulate the QuestionRead through the list of available topic areas, and select atopic on which you would like to write your next two papers. Formulate aspecific, concrete, ethical question pertaining to that topic, andplace that at the top of your paper.The question should be specific enough to discuss in sixto eight pages (which is the length of the Final Paper assignment). Forexample, if you were interested in discussing the topic of capitalpunishment, a question like “Is capital punishment wrong?” would be toovague, and would need to be reformulated as a more specific question,such as “Should we execute people convicted of first degree murder?” or“Is it just to use capital punishment when there is the possibility ofexecuting innocent persons?” or “Is the capital punishment systemracist?”Part Two: Provide a Brief Introduction to the TopicYour introduction should focus on setting out the topic andscope of the discussion in a way that clearly establishes what exactlyyou will be talking about and why it is significant. It should alsoprovide any necessary context such as the background, current state ofaffairs, definitions of key terms, and so on. You want to try to do thisin a way that stays as neutral as possible, avoids controversialassumptions, rhetorical questions, and the like. In other words, youshould try to construct an introduction to the topic that could be anintroduction to a paper defending any position on the question at issue.It is important for your introduction to narrow down the topicas much as possible. Doing so will allow you to provide a more detailedconsideration of the issues and explain the reasoning more clearly inlater papers. In general, arguments and analyses are much stronger whenthey focus on addressing a particular issue thoroughly and in detail,and doing so often requires deciding on one particular question orpoint to discuss, and leaving other possible ones aside.You should label this section of your paper as “Introduction.”Part Three: Provide a Position StatementState clearly and precisely the position you intend todefend on the question you have formulated. This does not need to bemore than one sentence.Note that providing a position statement does notnecessarily presume that you are confident in your position, that otherpositions do not have merit, or that you cannot change your mind later.However, for now, it is important to at least tentatively take a standon a position you believe to be better supported than others.Label this section as “Position Statement.”Part Four: Identify and Explain a Supporting ReasonIdentify and explain a plausible reason someone could givethat supports the position you have taken and be sure to clearly explainwhy you think it supports that position. The explanation should aim tobe three to five sentences (shorter explanations are possible, but willlikely be inadequate; longer explanations are likely to be tooverbose).Label this section as “Supporting Reason.”Part Five: Identify and Explain an Opposing ReasonIdentify and explain a plausible reason someone might givethat would oppose or challenge the position you have taken and be sureto clearly explain why you think it would oppose or challenge it. Theexplanation should aim to be three to five sentences (shorterexplanations are possible, but will likely be inadequate; longerexplanations are likely to be too verbose). You should strive toarticulate that reason in a way that someone defending a contraryposition to your own would do. This requires stepping back from your ownposition and being able to think about the problem as objectively asyou can. You should not attempt to respond to this opposing reason.